After the severe damage caused by the Coronavirus to the stock market and the economy, the virus struck the interest rates too.
Negative interest rates mean that investors will get back less money than they put into government securities instead of earning interest, and that cash deposited at a bank yields a storage charge, rather than the opportunity to earn interest income. They reverse normal lending costs. Commercial banks must pay to keep their money in central banks, rather than collecting interest on it.
That means they should have an incentive to lend their money at low cost to other banks, businesses, and consumers while charging some customers to deposit cash. In theory, that encourages people to borrow more, spend more and save less—stimulating the economy until negative rates aren’t needed.
Previously seen as a sort of theoretical thought experiment and a line that should never be crossed, the central bankers of some countries, notably slow-growing economies such as Japan and Switzerland, have experimented with setting negative interest rates.
Sweden’s central bank was the first to deploy them: In July 2009, the Riksbank cut its overnight deposit rate to -0.25%.
The European Central Bank (ECB) followed suit in June 2014 when it lowered its deposit rate to -0.1%.
However, places with negative rates such as Japan and Europe have had mixed results. Other European countries and Japan have since opted to offer negative interest rates, resulting in $9.5 trillion worth of government debt carrying negative yields in 2017.
Also, no major bank that introduced negative rates during Europe’s debt crisis has turned the main policy rates positive again, The Wall Street Journal reported.